Twelve angry men

Put yourself on trial, where 11 jurors out of 12 ballot culpable. Although you atomic number 18 innocent, and the one man in the jury who votes not guilty has reasonable doubt for your guilt. Your look is in twelve untamed mens hands. You can hardly make up yourself. Its up to the jurors to interpret the terminology in the testimonies to find the truth. In Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose the main factors that get to reasonable doubt for the jurors to vista at were; the cleaning charhood crossways the channel, the problems with the knife, and the old man who lived in the building. First, a woman testifies against the boy who lives directly across the street. Her window is parallel to the boys who is right off on trial. She claimed she had gone to bed almost 11 oclock. She was tossing and crook for about an hour, because it was a hot night. When she nervelessly looked out he window. She had seen the boy stab his father. The problems with this testimony are expla ined to the other jurors by juror #4 who points out the woman wears glasses. He excessively wore glasses and explained you didnt wear them when you go to sleep. When she coolly looked out the window, it in all likelihood wouldnt mystify been clear what she was looking at.

some other affair that might have blurred her vision would be the notch el train. She had to look threw the windows of it, to see the boy. The woman across the street looked through the windows of the last two cars of the el and maxim the clay fall pg. 143. Remember that she had been tossing and turning for an hour. Dont you think she would have been fractional asl eep and not sure of what she had seen?... ! If you want to impersonate a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay